Home | Mission | Background | Take Action Now! | Articles/Letters | Why Save The Trail? | Purple Line Threat | Developer Interests | Alternative Purple Line Solutions | Q&A's | Resources | Who We Are | PHOTOS|

Save The Trail Petition

Horizontal Rule

Press Releases

Horizontal Rule

News

Letters to Editors

Letters to Public Officials

Testimony

 

Press Releases:

County’s Own Cost Assessment Confirms:

Two Transit Lines for the Price of One

Would Be Possible With Bus Rapid Transit,

Town of Chevy Chase, July 24, 2008

 

 

PRESS RELEASE

July 24, 2008

Town of Chevy Chase

Contact:  Patricia Burda

 Phone:    240-899-6216        

                                                                                                                      

County’s Own Cost Assessment Confirms:

Two Transit Lines for the Price of One

Would Be Possible With Bus Rapid Transit

 

Montgomery County could have two mass transit lines for the price of one if the County puts taxpayers’ money into bus rapid transit instead of light rail, a study released by the County last week confirms. 

The report, released to the County’s Purple Line Advisory Committee, compares the Purple Line and Corridors City Transitway projects with other projects in the Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA) pipeline, rating the cost-effectiveness of various options.  It shows that bus rapid transit lines have a much higher chance of receiving federal funding than more expensive light rail transit alternatives. 

            Proponents of transit alternatives that would preserve the Capital Crescent Trail hailed the study's findings that bus rapid transit for the Purple Line on the Jones Bridge Road alignment between New Carrollton and Bethesda would fare much better in the FTA’s evaluation process than light rail long the Capital Crescent Trail.

The study shows that bus rapid transit lines for the Purple Line and Corridors City Transitway could both be built for a combined total of under $1 billion, while light rail on the Capital Crescent Trail would alone cost $1.6-$1.8 billion.

            To be considered at all for funding by the FTA, a project must meet a $24.00 or less cost-per-hour user benefit.  The high-end light rail just squeaks under this threshold at $23.71 when calculated at $1.6 billion, while both the Purple Line Jones Bridge Road alignment and the Corridor Cities Transitway bus rapid transit alternatives come in around $18.00.

“This is exactly what the Town of Chevy Chase’s consultants have said all along,” noted Town of Chevy Chase Mayor Kathy Strom.  “Our region needs to fight for transit that will give taxpayers the biggest bang for the buck -- and actually get built.  The County study shows that for those who truly support mass transit, like the Town, the drive should be for bus rapid transit for the region.”

Strom explained that is why the Town is pushing the State to reconsider its evaluation of the Jones Bridge Road Bus Rapid Transit alternative, the only alternative already under consideration that would help take some of the 4,000 new daily riders to Naval Medical Center off the road, still service Bethesda, and keep a valued community resource like the Capital Crescent Trail up and running safely for all users. “We believe if studied properly, this alignment would fare even better in the federal beauty contest,”  Mayor Strom added.

Maureen Jais-Mick, co-chair of Rethinking the Purple Line, a coalition of 18 community groups who favor transit solutions that spare the Trail, said the County study confirms that saving the Trail is cost-effective and that better transit solutions exist along other alignments.

 “We question why certain groups have focused solely on one mode on one route – expensive light rail on the Capital Crescent Trail – rather than the best mode on the best route.”

The Maryland Transit Administration will issue a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) in mid-September on all transit alternatives under consideration. Following public hearings, the State will select a “preferred alternative” to send forward for funding consideration by the Federal Transit Administration.

************

January 29, 2007

CONTACT:
Senator Rich Madaleno, Dist. 18, 301-858-3137
Delegate Jane Lawton, Dist. 18, 301-858-3638
Mier Wolf, GBCCC, 301-654-2254
Pam Browning, Save the Trail Petition, 301-654-0183

Light Rail Purple Line Won't Relieve Congestion - It's a Developer-Driven Plan, Opponents Charge

“A light rail Purple Line along the Capital Crescent Trail between Bethesda and Silver Spring is an ill-conceived plan and would be a poor use of scarce transit funding. Light rail would do nothing to improve the Metro System or alleviate congestion on major arteries,” says District 18 Senator Richard Madaleno.

“Studies have shown that a light rail Purple Line along the Trail between Bethesda and Silver Spring will not take cars off the road, or significantly reduce traffic congestion or air pollution. With light rail, Metro cars will not be able to travel the short distance between Bethesda and Silver Spring. This makes no sense,” according to Mier Wolf, President of the Bethesda Chevy Chase Coalition.

District 18 Delegate Jane Lawton supports tunneling the Purple Line as Metro rail between Bethesda and Silver Spring. “It will increase ridership, expand Metro’s ability to run alternate routes in emergencies, and protect the Trail”.

More than 10,000 trail users have petitioned lawmakers to tunnel the Purple Line as Metro rail, or route it elsewhere other than alongside the Capital Crescent Trail between Bethesda and Silver Spring.

“The Light Rail will be an environmental disaster -- clear-cutting thousands of trees and degrading the most popular trail in Maryland.  All of the trees along the trail will be destroyed – replaced by catenary wires. Trains will run on double tracks every three minutes, a few feet from hikers, bikers, families, children, and the elderly”, according to Pam Browning, the Petition Drive’s Organizer.

“Just like the proposed above-ground transit plan for Tysons Corner, the proposed light rail along the Capital Crescent Trail is an unpopular, developer-driven plan.   Bechtel Corporation performed the original EIS for the light rail along the Capital Crescent Trail, and now Bechtel is pushing the above ground rail at Tysons Corner.  Bechtel will lose these contracts if transit is tunneled”, says Browning.

“Meanwhile, Chevy Chase Land Company has been buying up all the land around the proposed light rail station at Connecticut Avenue.  With a station there, density ceilings will be lifted to permit much greater development. Yet, neither the Bethesda-Chevy Chase community nor commuters want mega-development on Connecticut Avenue.  The net result will be more traffic congestion, not less”.

Return to Table of Contents

Horizontal Rule